February 24, 2010 – 10:43 am
Over the past few days, folks at Big Government and The American Prospect have been debating the issue of how much government employees ought to make. It’s an interesting topic, but neither of the parties in that debate touch on the real reasons this issue bugs me. Public employees constitute a labor pool that isn’t subject to the standard adjustment mechanisms that the economy imposes on everyone else. This is an economy that’s trying to deflate as it deleverages. There’s a lot of reasons why this is bad, but it’s also a large force that you can’t block without some serious consequences. If you try to stop water flowing downhill, you’ll get wet.
Also, the debaters are concentrating on salary only. Obviously, a sector that hires mostly lawyers and trained professionals like teachers and nurses will tend to higher salaries. But the exceptionally generous pensions, benefits and job security that public employees get are compensation too. You can argue this point, but the economy sees those items as part of the cost of the labor.
February 15, 2010 – 11:24 pm
Evidently, we are supposed to believe that Los Angeles can dig itself out of a fiscal hole without cutting either union jobs, or pay rates for unionized members.
January 16, 2010 – 7:54 am
Once the New York Times embraces free-market orthodoxy, you know something different is in the air. It’s typical for progressives to reach market-oriented conclusions by walking around the block rather than just going next door, but that’s a different issue. If the current round of health reform legislation should fail, then we can start the process from scratch, by looking at its goals and start proposing far simpler and less costly ways to achieve them.
October 16, 2009 – 12:12 am
Take a look at the contrast between union claims about the health benefits at Whole Foods, and the actual facts concerning Whole Foods’s approach to providing health care for its employees:
October 8, 2009 – 1:04 am
And here I was thinking that there was no constituency the Democrats didn’t want to tax.
There is something deeply disturbing about the Obama Administration’s willingness to abrogate contracts, agreements, and the legal rights of others as it continues to expand government’s role and crowds out private sector rights in the process.
Despite its promises of government transparency, the Obama Administration is perfectly happy to keep things opaque when it comes to the activities of organized labor.
March 27, 2009 – 12:37 am
Want to know what might happen if card-check legislation gets passed?
By Pejman Yousefzadeh
|
Posted in Blogs, Chequer-Board
|
Also tagged Big Labor, card check, economy, Employee Free Choice Act, Intimidation, Labor Policy, Obama Administration, Politics, Threats, Violence
|
February 2, 2009 – 9:33 am
The Obama Administration is cheerfully working to craft and implement disastrous labor policies that will only serve to reward unions with greater political power at the expense of genuine workplace fairness and economic growth itself.