Sorry to return to the topic of Thomas Friedman so soon, but evidently, he thinks that if one combines NaCl, CO2, and H2O together, he will get calcium carbonate.
This despite the fact that there is no calcium whatsoever in that equation, save the one that Friedman posited would exist as the result of it.
Really, doesn’t the New York Times have factcheckers? Or better yet, superior columnists who could take over Friedman’s space, and make us resolutely not miss him?
February 2, 2010 – 11:26 pm
Perhaps the unbelievably silly idea that vaccines cause autism will now be put to rest, thus allowing parents to responsibly care for their children, and protect them against disease.
January 31, 2010 – 1:28 pm
Seriously, someone needs to revoke Rajendra Pachauri’s Nobel Prize:
January 30, 2010 – 1:30 pm
This issue has been noted before, but it is worth reawakening interest and attention in light of this story:
January 21, 2010 – 1:26 pm
Look, I am worried enough about the environment to want to make sure that climatologists get things right; it would be rather bad if they didn’t, and if we made policy based on erroneous assumptions.
December 7, 2009 – 11:57 am
Because the Left provides greater scope than the Right for the exercise of power over civil society in the name of what science says is good for us — and because it denies the sources of moral remonstrance that can stand as a bulwark against scientific hubris — it will continue to offer the greatest temptations for scientists to be seduced by power.
By Dan McLaughlin
|
Posted in Features, Politics
|
Also tagged AGW, Barack Obama, climate change, Climategate, Copenhagen, Global Warming, hockey stick, Junk Science, Science and its Enemies, Stem Cells
|
December 5, 2009 – 3:16 pm
Here is a good statement of the problem raised by the e-mails from the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit:
By Pejman Yousefzadeh
|
Posted in Blogs, Chequer-Board
|
Also tagged Anthropogenic Global Warming, climate change, Climate Change Policy, Environment, Environmental Policy, Global Warming, Phil Jones, Possible Scientific Fraud, Scientists Behaving Badly, University of East Anglia Climate Research Unit
|
December 5, 2009 – 12:57 am
If we get the oceans to rise, there will be beachfront erosion. That will leave less sand for Democrats to stick their heads in when confronted by inconvenient scandals.
By Pejman Yousefzadeh
|
Posted in Blogs, Chequer-Board
|
Also tagged Anthropogenic Global Warming, climate change, Climate Change Policy, Environment, Environmental Policy, Global Warming, Jon Stewart, Phil Jones, Possible Scientific Fraud, Scientists Behaving Badly, University of East Anglia Climate Research Unit
|
December 2, 2009 – 9:11 am
As a consequence of the leaked e-mails from the University of East Anglia, Phil Jones, the director of the university’s Climate Research Unit, has been forced to step aside.
By Pejman Yousefzadeh
|
Posted in Blogs, Chequer-Board
|
Also tagged Anthropogenic Global Warming, climate change, Climate Change Policy, Environment, Environmental Policy, Global Warming, Phil Jones, Possible Scientific Fraud, Ronald Bailey, Scientists Behaving Badly, University of East Anglia Climate Research Unit
|
November 29, 2009 – 1:50 pm
Possibly. Scientists in New Zealand are alleged to have cooked the books as well. Whether this turns out to be the case or not, it is clear that the leaked e-mails from the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia have caused significant credibility problems for the climate research community.
By Pejman Yousefzadeh
|
Posted in Blogs, Chequer-Board
|
Also tagged Anthropogenic Global Warming, climate change, Climate Change Policy, Environment, Environmental Policy, George Monbiot, Global Warming, Judith Curry, New Zealand, Possible Scientific Fraud, Scientists Behaving Badly, University of East Anglia Climate Research Unit
|
November 20, 2009 – 9:22 pm
I am going to be rather careful about this story, as the details of it are in the preliminary stages of dribbling out to the public. But, long story short: The University of East Anglia Climate Research Unit got its e-mail system hacked, and the e-mails have been made public. What they reveal is the possibility that climate scientists may have fudged data concerning global warming.