Look who’s back:

When Raúl Castro became president of Cuba in 2006, he raised hopes, at home and abroad, that he would usher in a new era of reform. His brother, El Comandante Fidel, was struck with some sort of intestinal illness and rendered incapable of governing. So in stepped Raúl with promises to undertake “structural” change in the country. He distributed parcels of idle land to farmers. He encouraged young people, many of whom feel restive about their country’s system, to “fearlessly debate” the country’s problems. He decreed that Cubans could finally buy cell phones and computers, and could stay at tourist hotels that had previously been off-limits to them. When it came to relations with the United States, he said last April, “We are prepared to discuss everything—human rights, freedom of the press, political prisoners—everything, everything, everything.”

Obviously, I have a thing for French blog titles that correspond with appalling stories concerning totalitarian oppression. I could live a thousand years, and never understand why people try to make the Castro brothers out to be nice people, or the Cuban government the salt of the Earth.

Are the people who spent eight years denouncing George W. Bush as the most monstrous of modern day dictators going to say anything about this? I suspect I know the answer, but I would really like for my suspicion to be misplaced.