<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
>

<channel>
	<title>The New Ledger &#187; Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newledger.com/section/sections/politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newledger.com</link>
	<description>The New Ledger on News, Politics, and Market issues of the day. Welcome to the Know.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 23:23:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/1.0.3" mode="advanced" entry="normal" -->
	<itunes:summary>Coffee and Markets is a weekly podcast on markets, politics, and the economy from The New Ledger. It features Wall Street veteran Francis Cianfrocca and is sponsored by BigGovernment.com.</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>The New Ledger</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://newledger.com/wp-content/plugins/powerpress/itunes_default.jpg" />
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>The New Ledger</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>media@newledger.com</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<managingEditor>media@newledger.com (The New Ledger)</managingEditor>
	<copyright>The New Ledger</copyright>
	<itunes:subtitle>Coffee and Markets</itunes:subtitle>
	
	<itunes:category text="News &amp; Politics" />
		<item>
		<title>Can Nancy Pelosi Get the Votes?</title>
		<link>http://newledger.com/2010/03/can-nancy-pelosi-get-the-votes/</link>
		<comments>http://newledger.com/2010/03/can-nancy-pelosi-get-the-votes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newledger.com/?p=25006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Are there enough votes in the House to pass the Senate&#8217;s health-care bill? As of today, it&#8217;s clear there aren&#8217;t. House Democratic leaders have brushed aside White House calls to bring the bill forward by March 18, when President Barack Obama heads to Asia. Nevertheless, analysts close to the Democratic leadership tell me they&#8217;re confident the leadership will find some way to squeeze out the 216 votes needed for a majority.</p>
<p>Speaker Nancy Pelosi has indeed shown mastery at amassing majorities. But it&#8217;s hard to see how she&#8217;ll do so on this one. The arithmetic as I see it doesn&#8217;t add up. </p></blockquote>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Are there enough votes in the House to pass the Senate&#8217;s health-care bill? As of today, it&#8217;s clear there aren&#8217;t. House Democratic leaders have brushed aside White House calls to bring the bill forward by March 18, when President Barack Obama heads to Asia. Nevertheless, analysts close to the Democratic leadership tell me they&#8217;re confident the leadership will find some way to squeeze out the 216 votes needed for a majority.</p>
<p>Speaker Nancy Pelosi has indeed shown mastery at amassing majorities. But it&#8217;s hard to see how she&#8217;ll do so on this one. The arithmetic as I see it doesn&#8217;t add up. </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://newledger.com/2010/03/can-nancy-pelosi-get-the-votes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Americans&#8217; Global Warming Concerns Continue to Drop</title>
		<link>http://newledger.com/2010/03/americans-global-warming-concerns-continue-to-drop/</link>
		<comments>http://newledger.com/2010/03/americans-global-warming-concerns-continue-to-drop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newledger.com/?p=25004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Gallup&#8217;s annual update on Americans&#8217; attitudes toward the environment shows a public that over the last two years has become less worried about the threat of global warming, less convinced that its effects are already happening, and more likely to believe that scientists themselves are uncertain about its occurrence. In response to one key question, 48% of Americans now believe that the seriousness of global warming is generally exaggerated, up from 41% in 2009 and 31% in 1997, when Gallup first asked the question.</p></blockquote>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Gallup&#8217;s annual update on Americans&#8217; attitudes toward the environment shows a public that over the last two years has become less worried about the threat of global warming, less convinced that its effects are already happening, and more likely to believe that scientists themselves are uncertain about its occurrence. In response to one key question, 48% of Americans now believe that the seriousness of global warming is generally exaggerated, up from 41% in 2009 and 31% in 1997, when Gallup first asked the question.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://newledger.com/2010/03/americans-global-warming-concerns-continue-to-drop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House leaders call pro-life group&#8217;s bluff</title>
		<link>http://newledger.com/2010/03/house-leaders-call-pro-life-groups-bluff/</link>
		<comments>http://newledger.com/2010/03/house-leaders-call-pro-life-groups-bluff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newledger.com/?p=25002</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>A top House Democrat said Thursday that leaders may not have to change the Senate health care bill&#8217;s abortion-related provisions to meet the demands of 12 members who have threatened to walk.</p>
<p>Rep. Bart Stupak, a pro-life Michigan Democrat, has said he and 11 other Democrats who voted for the House bill will oppose the Senate bill unless strong abortion restrictions are added. </p></blockquote>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>A top House Democrat said Thursday that leaders may not have to change the Senate health care bill&#8217;s abortion-related provisions to meet the demands of 12 members who have threatened to walk.</p>
<p>Rep. Bart Stupak, a pro-life Michigan Democrat, has said he and 11 other Democrats who voted for the House bill will oppose the Senate bill unless strong abortion restrictions are added. </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://newledger.com/2010/03/house-leaders-call-pro-life-groups-bluff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Andrew Breitbart Hacks the Media</title>
		<link>http://newledger.com/2010/03/how-andrew-breitbart-hacks-the-media/</link>
		<comments>http://newledger.com/2010/03/how-andrew-breitbart-hacks-the-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newledger.com/?p=25000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Andrew Breitbart has been waiting 45 minutes for a filet mignon. He drums his fingers on the table in this plush Italian restaurant off Times Square, a place where the media types he regularly trashes used to flaunt their expense accounts — back when they still had them. Breitbart looks around for a waiter and launches into a stem-winder about collusion between Hollywood and the press — the “subtle and not-so-subtle use of propaganda to make a center-right nation move to the left.</p>
<p>“It’s not just the nightly news,” he says. “You’re also getting television shows that reflect the same worldview, where Republicans are always the bad guys. Al Qaeda’s never the bad guy. The Republican is always the bad guy.”</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Andrew Breitbart has been waiting 45 minutes for a filet mignon. He drums his fingers on the table in this plush Italian restaurant off Times Square, a place where the media types he regularly trashes used to flaunt their expense accounts — back when they still had them. Breitbart looks around for a waiter and launches into a stem-winder about collusion between Hollywood and the press — the “subtle and not-so-subtle use of propaganda to make a center-right nation move to the left.</p>
<p>“It’s not just the nightly news,” he says. “You’re also getting television shows that reflect the same worldview, where Republicans are always the bad guys. Al Qaeda’s never the bad guy. The Republican is always the bad guy.”</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://newledger.com/2010/03/how-andrew-breitbart-hacks-the-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chris Dodd goes forward without GOP support</title>
		<link>http://newledger.com/2010/03/chris-dodd-goes-forward-without-gop-support/</link>
		<comments>http://newledger.com/2010/03/chris-dodd-goes-forward-without-gop-support/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newledger.com/?p=24997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Senate Banking Chairman Chris Dodd, concerned that bipartisan talks are losing momentum, will unveil his own financial reform bill Monday without the full support of his Republican negotiating partners.</p>
<p>Dodd stressed in a statement that his talks with Republican Sen. Bob Corker of Tennessee would continue. His new bill will reflect the agreements he and Corker accomplished over many weeks of talks, Dodd said.</p></blockquote>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Senate Banking Chairman Chris Dodd, concerned that bipartisan talks are losing momentum, will unveil his own financial reform bill Monday without the full support of his Republican negotiating partners.</p>
<p>Dodd stressed in a statement that his talks with Republican Sen. Bob Corker of Tennessee would continue. His new bill will reflect the agreements he and Corker accomplished over many weeks of talks, Dodd said.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://newledger.com/2010/03/chris-dodd-goes-forward-without-gop-support/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Happened to a &#8220;Simple Up-Or-Down-Vote&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://newledger.com/2010/03/what-happened-to-a-simple-up-or-down-vote/</link>
		<comments>http://newledger.com/2010/03/what-happened-to-a-simple-up-or-down-vote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newledger.com/?p=24994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> In making the case for ramming through health care legislation via reconciliation, the White House has called for a &#8220;simple up-or-down vote.&#8221; But as we know, there&#8217;s nothing &#8220;simple&#8221; about the reconciliation process, and as it turns out, House Democrats are plotting to pass a bill without the &#8220;up-or-down vote&#8221; part either.</p>
<p>As Congress Daily first reported, &#8220;House Rules Chairwoman Louise Slaughter is prepping to help usher the healthcare overhaul through the House and potentially avoid a direct vote on the Senate overhaul bill.&#8221; The idea is to use a legislative trick called a &#8220;self-executing rule&#8221; that would allow House members to approve the reconciliation bill, and consider the Senate bill to have automatically passed, thus avoiding a vote on a bill that&#8217;s not only unpopular with the public, but among Democratic House members.</p></blockquote>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> In making the case for ramming through health care legislation via reconciliation, the White House has called for a &#8220;simple up-or-down vote.&#8221; But as we know, there&#8217;s nothing &#8220;simple&#8221; about the reconciliation process, and as it turns out, House Democrats are plotting to pass a bill without the &#8220;up-or-down vote&#8221; part either.</p>
<p>As Congress Daily first reported, &#8220;House Rules Chairwoman Louise Slaughter is prepping to help usher the healthcare overhaul through the House and potentially avoid a direct vote on the Senate overhaul bill.&#8221; The idea is to use a legislative trick called a &#8220;self-executing rule&#8221; that would allow House members to approve the reconciliation bill, and consider the Senate bill to have automatically passed, thus avoiding a vote on a bill that&#8217;s not only unpopular with the public, but among Democratic House members.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://newledger.com/2010/03/what-happened-to-a-simple-up-or-down-vote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wired Magazine, Conde Nast Scoop Breitbart, the ‘Bigs’ — HUD next O’Keefe Video Sting Target</title>
		<link>http://newledger.com/2010/03/wired-magazine-conde-nast-scoop-breitbart-the-%e2%80%98bigs%e2%80%99-%e2%80%94-hud-next-o%e2%80%99keefe-video-sting-target/</link>
		<comments>http://newledger.com/2010/03/wired-magazine-conde-nast-scoop-breitbart-the-%e2%80%98bigs%e2%80%99-%e2%80%94-hud-next-o%e2%80%99keefe-video-sting-target/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newledger.com/?p=24992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>This time, there are no prostitutes involved, just a shady, and serious, tax-fraud scheme. The ploy involves the Obama administration’s 10 percent tax credit to first-time home buyers. The law says that the credit maxes out at $8,000 for an $80,000 home. But at the Detroit office of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the rule seems open to interpretation. O’Keefe asks a staffer, What if I bought a place for $50,000, but the seller and I agreed to write down $80,000 as the purchase price?</p>
<p>    “Flip it any way you want,” the staffer replies.</p>
<p>    What if the place is worth much less — like only $6,000?</p>
<p>    “Yup, you can do that.”</p></blockquote>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>This time, there are no prostitutes involved, just a shady, and serious, tax-fraud scheme. The ploy involves the Obama administration’s 10 percent tax credit to first-time home buyers. The law says that the credit maxes out at $8,000 for an $80,000 home. But at the Detroit office of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the rule seems open to interpretation. O’Keefe asks a staffer, What if I bought a place for $50,000, but the seller and I agreed to write down $80,000 as the purchase price?</p>
<p>    “Flip it any way you want,” the staffer replies.</p>
<p>    What if the place is worth much less — like only $6,000?</p>
<p>    “Yup, you can do that.”</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://newledger.com/2010/03/wired-magazine-conde-nast-scoop-breitbart-the-%e2%80%98bigs%e2%80%99-%e2%80%94-hud-next-o%e2%80%99keefe-video-sting-target/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hoyer Confident Health Care Will Pass Without Abortion Changes</title>
		<link>http://newledger.com/2010/03/hoyer-confident-health-care-will-pass-without-abortion-changes/</link>
		<comments>http://newledger.com/2010/03/hoyer-confident-health-care-will-pass-without-abortion-changes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newledger.com/?p=24990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) said Thursday he believes House leaders can get the votes for President Barack Obama’s health care reform package without changing the abortion language in the Senate bill.</p>
<p>Hoyer was asked about comments from Energy and Commerce Chairman Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) in an Associated Press story that House leaders had decided to press ahead without changing the abortion restrictions. A group of anti-abortion-rights Democrats led by Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) has been threatening to kill the bill over the issue. </p></blockquote>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) said Thursday he believes House leaders can get the votes for President Barack Obama’s health care reform package without changing the abortion language in the Senate bill.</p>
<p>Hoyer was asked about comments from Energy and Commerce Chairman Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) in an Associated Press story that House leaders had decided to press ahead without changing the abortion restrictions. A group of anti-abortion-rights Democrats led by Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) has been threatening to kill the bill over the issue. </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://newledger.com/2010/03/hoyer-confident-health-care-will-pass-without-abortion-changes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China Threatens Google</title>
		<link>http://newledger.com/2010/03/china-threatens-google/</link>
		<comments>http://newledger.com/2010/03/china-threatens-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newledger.com/?p=24987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The communist Chinese government threatened Google yesterday saying, &#8220;that the U.S. Internet company &#8216;will have to bear the consequences&#8217; if its follows through on its pledge to stop censoring its Chinese search site.&#8221;  Go get those commies Google!</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The communist Chinese government threatened Google yesterday saying, &#8220;that the U.S. Internet company &#8216;will have to bear the consequences&#8217; if its follows through on its pledge to stop censoring its Chinese search site.&#8221;  Go get those commies Google!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://newledger.com/2010/03/china-threatens-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ruling Kills an Option for Moving Health Bill</title>
		<link>http://newledger.com/2010/03/ruling-kills-an-option-for-moving-health-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://newledger.com/2010/03/ruling-kills-an-option-for-moving-health-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newledger.com/?p=24959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The Senate Parliamentarian has ruled that President Barack Obama must sign Congress’ original health care reform bill before the Senate can act on a companion reconciliation package, senior GOP sources said Thursday.</p>
<p>The Senate Parliamentarian’s Office was responding to questions posed by the Republican leadership. The answers were provided verbally, sources said.</p></blockquote>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The Senate Parliamentarian has ruled that President Barack Obama must sign Congress’ original health care reform bill before the Senate can act on a companion reconciliation package, senior GOP sources said Thursday.</p>
<p>The Senate Parliamentarian’s Office was responding to questions posed by the Republican leadership. The answers were provided verbally, sources said.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://newledger.com/2010/03/ruling-kills-an-option-for-moving-health-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dems Consider Drastic Moves to Pass Health Bill</title>
		<link>http://newledger.com/2010/03/dems-consider-drastic-moves-to-pass-health-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://newledger.com/2010/03/dems-consider-drastic-moves-to-pass-health-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newledger.com/?p=24957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In order to pass Obamacare, Democrats on the Hill, &#8220;are considering an unprecedented parliamentary procedure which would essentially enable the House of Representatives to pass the Senate version of the reform package without ever voting on it.&#8221;</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In order to pass Obamacare, Democrats on the Hill, &#8220;are considering an unprecedented parliamentary procedure which would essentially enable the House of Representatives to pass the Senate version of the reform package without ever voting on it.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://newledger.com/2010/03/dems-consider-drastic-moves-to-pass-health-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York Assemblyman Wants to Ban Use of Salt in Restaurants</title>
		<link>http://newledger.com/2010/03/new-york-assemblyman-wants-to-ban-use-of-salt-in-restaurants/</link>
		<comments>http://newledger.com/2010/03/new-york-assemblyman-wants-to-ban-use-of-salt-in-restaurants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newledger.com/?p=24951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>From the annuls of, &#8220;It&#8217;s not my fault I&#8217;m unhealthy it&#8217;s yours!&#8221; NY Assemblyman Felix Ortiz wants ban chefs in the world&#8217;s #1 food city from using salt.  Yet another Democrat &#8220;jobs plan&#8221; that sinks America further into economic and social ruin. </p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the annuls of, &#8220;It&#8217;s not my fault I&#8217;m unhealthy it&#8217;s yours!&#8221; NY Assemblyman Felix Ortiz wants ban chefs in the world&#8217;s #1 food city from using salt.  Yet another Democrat &#8220;jobs plan&#8221; that sinks America further into economic and social ruin. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://newledger.com/2010/03/new-york-assemblyman-wants-to-ban-use-of-salt-in-restaurants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
