Comments on: What Does Ruth Bader Ginsburg Mean By “The Populations That We Don’t Want to Have Too Many Of”?

By: kbsourk

kbsourk — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:33:34 +0000

When unborn babies are aborted, there is no respect for babies lives, just go to the other end of the spectrum, old people are no longer useful, they no longer work for a living and they only take from the government, social security (which they paid into) medicare (which they paid into with their taxes), therefore they are also expendable. Life has no value, it can be terminiated at the will of the people. Babies, abortion, old people, euthanasia. This is of course, absurdity. Man was created in the image of God.

By: adam77

adam77 — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 22:45:35 +0000

Only contraception can save the world

By: bdomenech

bdomenech — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 16:14:46 +0000

Nixon, as always, had the restraint and subtlety of a sledgehammer.

By: joeyess

joeyess — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 15:12:25 +0000

In regards to your post about abortion/Ginsburg? You're a lying, little, piece of shit.

Why didn't you include the ENTIRE quote, Benny? Afraid that would undermine your argument? Or did you not finish your own work again?

By: hellno

hellno — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 14:03:12 +0000

You are right, but the problem is that we don't know what the liberals that made the law a reality were saying in the secrecy of their offices and homes.

By: kadim

kadim — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 06:20:43 +0000

One idea is to look what Nixon said, in newly released tapes:

Nixon worried that greater access to abortions would foster “permissiveness,” and said that “it breaks the family.” But he also saw a need for abortion in some cases — like interracial pregnancies, he said.

“There are times when an abortion is necessary. I know that. When you have a black and a white,” he told an aide, before adding, “Or a rape.”

To be fair, Nixon is more on the liberal side of things in my opinion.