<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Palin, We&#8217;re Asking the Wrong Question</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newledger.com/2009/07/on-sarah-palin-were-asking-the-wrong-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newledger.com/2009/07/on-sarah-palin-were-asking-the-wrong-question/</link>
	<description>The New Ledger on News, Politics, and Market issues of the day. Welcome to the Know.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 00:57:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dirtt</title>
		<link>http://newledger.com/2009/07/on-sarah-palin-were-asking-the-wrong-question/comment-page-1/#comment-357</link>
		<dc:creator>Dirtt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 05:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newledger.com/?p=13646#comment-357</guid>
		<description>Concur.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I know it is wildly nuts - beyond infantile political blathering - and completely irrational. I know the concept would meet instant ridicule from anyone with any sort of knowledge about the Inside The Beltway game.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Might I suggest to Sarah&#039;s people that Ron Paul has credibility with a large number of equity traders I speak with continually.  And that equity traders for the most part GET IT.  We may disagree but we still GET IT.  And what we don&#039;t GET is in control of the US Parliament.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Paul - Palin 2012&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mrs. Palin I appeal to you to get that Pittsburgh guy into the White House.  You will STEAMROLL. Not sure how Ron Paul would feel about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Concur.</p>
<p>I know it is wildly nuts &#8211; beyond infantile political blathering &#8211; and completely irrational. I know the concept would meet instant ridicule from anyone with any sort of knowledge about the Inside The Beltway game.</p>
<p>Might I suggest to Sarah&#39;s people that Ron Paul has credibility with a large number of equity traders I speak with continually.  And that equity traders for the most part GET IT.  We may disagree but we still GET IT.  And what we don&#39;t GET is in control of the US Parliament.</p>
<p>Paul &#8211; Palin 2012</p>
<p>Mrs. Palin I appeal to you to get that Pittsburgh guy into the White House.  You will STEAMROLL. Not sure how Ron Paul would feel about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ReaganiteRepublican</title>
		<link>http://newledger.com/2009/07/on-sarah-palin-were-asking-the-wrong-question/comment-page-1/#comment-356</link>
		<dc:creator>ReaganiteRepublican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newledger.com/?p=13646#comment-356</guid>
		<description>What I&#039;m thinking is that Palin’s move puts yet more pressure on Obama to finally get some results, as the soaring rhetoric isn’t hypnotizing the plebes like it used to. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Last week Helen Thomas, Colin Powell, and Warren Buffet all turned on him. Polls are looking droopy for The One lately.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And Obama’s porkulus program is a train wreck, all it’s done is bump interest rates and tank the dollar. We are being laughed at by bad guys like Tehran, Pyongyang, and Al Qaida who amazingly turned-down Barack’s friend-requests.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Palin could trounce him in 2012, when Americans would vote for the Gipper-in-Heels in droves- while begging for lower taxes, free enterpise, a defense posture with some backbone… an end to the radical, anti-American nightmare we’ve got now.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Go get ‘em Sarah-&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://reaganiterepublicanresistance.blogspot.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://reaganiterepublicanresistance.blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I&#39;m thinking is that Palin’s move puts yet more pressure on Obama to finally get some results, as the soaring rhetoric isn’t hypnotizing the plebes like it used to. </p>
<p>Last week Helen Thomas, Colin Powell, and Warren Buffet all turned on him. Polls are looking droopy for The One lately.</p>
<p>And Obama’s porkulus program is a train wreck, all it’s done is bump interest rates and tank the dollar. We are being laughed at by bad guys like Tehran, Pyongyang, and Al Qaida who amazingly turned-down Barack’s friend-requests.</p>
<p>Palin could trounce him in 2012, when Americans would vote for the Gipper-in-Heels in droves- while begging for lower taxes, free enterpise, a defense posture with some backbone… an end to the radical, anti-American nightmare we’ve got now.</p>
<p>Go get ‘em Sarah-</p>
<p><a href="http://reaganiterepublicanresistance.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://reaganiterepublicanresistance.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dbufkin</title>
		<link>http://newledger.com/2009/07/on-sarah-palin-were-asking-the-wrong-question/comment-page-1/#comment-354</link>
		<dc:creator>dbufkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 17:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newledger.com/?p=13646#comment-354</guid>
		<description>The fact remains no one has ever won the GOP nomination with a resume as thin as this. We can argue the past is necessarily prolouge but this is the reality. As Fred Barnes says, maybe her sights are -- or should be -- on 2016.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If she has something other than retreat from public life -- or averting the glare of an as yet undisclosed scandal -- in mind, then she has handled it in a way that itself disqualifying. Ipso facto.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;David Bufkin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact remains no one has ever won the GOP nomination with a resume as thin as this. We can argue the past is necessarily prolouge but this is the reality. As Fred Barnes says, maybe her sights are &#8212; or should be &#8212; on 2016.</p>
<p>If she has something other than retreat from public life &#8212; or averting the glare of an as yet undisclosed scandal &#8212; in mind, then she has handled it in a way that itself disqualifying. Ipso facto.</p>
<p>David Bufkin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
