TNL Features - Politics

On Palin, We’re Asking the Wrong Question

by Francis Cianfrocca

Sarah Palin Resigns

Let’s assume for the hell of it that Sarah Palin is interested in being an influencer in the national debate, and even that she might like to be President someday. Does being governor of Alaska advance her cause, with or without the constant nuisance lawsuits and ethics investigations? It doesn’t.

Running Alaska doesn’t really qualify as executive experience in the first place in the minds of voters and the political elite — and besides, the electorate has made it abundantly clear that lack of experience is a red herring. She’s not going to stop getting sued by lefties who hate the fact that she’s the only conservative voice which also happens to be presentable and articulate. But now that she’s a free agent, she can move to somewhere in the lower 48 (Atlanta would be an intriguing choice), start up a robust legal defense fund, and launch her media career.

ADVERTISEMENT

In 2008, Americans voted for a radical left-wing message that’s plainly toxic to much of this country’s history and ideals, primarily because they were seduced by the messenger. Republicans generally have this fantasy that good ideas and good experience (see McCain’s best argument for his election) will win, but that assumes that Americans select their leaders with a process that emphasizes those things. They don’t. Adam Lambert didn’t win American Idol for the same reason. To say that things should be different is a waste of time.

What about the point that she got out of the kitchen when it got too hot? In the future, the only people who will remember that are the same ones who insist that a Presidential candidate needs to be qualified by executive experience in government. As I said, there’s no upside for her in Alaska, and she needs to get out of there and into circulation. Besides, if she really isn’t made of steel, that will become apparent readily enough in the next few years.

It was rare and serendipitous to be gifted with Ronald Reagan as a vehicle for the conservative message, especially after his days spent as a national television figure with GE. Now that Republicans have Sarah Palin, they shouldn’t waste her, whether or not she ever runs for President. National-class charisma doesn’t come along every decade. And the fact that she’s a lightning rod for everyone who otherwise believes in women’s rights is a bonus.

Palin’s not a policy expert, and never presented herself as one. She’s never going to be a state governor again. She could be Vice President someday. Otherwise, the only elective office that makes sense for her is President. Will she be President in 2012? Nope. The only thing that can stop Obama is… well, nothing. But she has 25 years ahead in which to make the case, and perhaps someday she’ll run.

Republicans have a habit of disqualifying talented people permanently for their first misstep, or perceived misstep. The Democrats are swooning over their good fortune at having opponents that insist on perfection. If Palin is thinking in the back of her mind that she might run for President someday, that necessarily means she’s betting that the people will either forget about this episode, or else not see it in the same light as Republican bigwigs and pundits do.

But it doesn’t necessarily matter. If Republicans are going to be electorally ineffective for years to come, as seems likely, then the only way to keep the Democrats from seriously damaging America will be for strong conservative voices to speak out from a position like Palin’s. Even if she never holds elected office again, she will influence the conversation strongly.

Read more at Francis Cianfrocca’s blog.

TNL
  • dbufkin
    The fact remains no one has ever won the GOP nomination with a resume as thin as this. We can argue the past is necessarily prolouge but this is the reality. As Fred Barnes says, maybe her sights are -- or should be -- on 2016.

    If she has something other than retreat from public life -- or averting the glare of an as yet undisclosed scandal -- in mind, then she has handled it in a way that itself disqualifying. Ipso facto.

    David Bufkin
  • ReaganiteRepublican
    What I'm thinking is that Palin’s move puts yet more pressure on Obama to finally get some results, as the soaring rhetoric isn’t hypnotizing the plebes like it used to.

    Last week Helen Thomas, Colin Powell, and Warren Buffet all turned on him. Polls are looking droopy for The One lately.

    And Obama’s porkulus program is a train wreck, all it’s done is bump interest rates and tank the dollar. We are being laughed at by bad guys like Tehran, Pyongyang, and Al Qaida who amazingly turned-down Barack’s friend-requests.

    Palin could trounce him in 2012, when Americans would vote for the Gipper-in-Heels in droves- while begging for lower taxes, free enterpise, a defense posture with some backbone… an end to the radical, anti-American nightmare we’ve got now.

    Go get ‘em Sarah-

    http://reaganiterepublicanresistance.blogspot.com
  • Dirtt
    Concur.

    I know it is wildly nuts - beyond infantile political blathering - and completely irrational. I know the concept would meet instant ridicule from anyone with any sort of knowledge about the Inside The Beltway game.

    Might I suggest to Sarah's people that Ron Paul has credibility with a large number of equity traders I speak with continually. And that equity traders for the most part GET IT. We may disagree but we still GET IT. And what we don't GET is in control of the US Parliament.

    Paul - Palin 2012

    Mrs. Palin I appeal to you to get that Pittsburgh guy into the White House. You will STEAMROLL. Not sure how Ron Paul would feel about it.
blog comments powered by Disqus
- February 9, 2010 -

MORE LEDGER

ELSEWHERE ON TNL

POLITICS

MARKET

BLOGS

EDGE

CONSERVATION